Микробиологический маркетинг

http://davydov.blogspot.com/

Про собаку Павлова и коэффициент размножения бизнеса - очень достойно.
И вообще интересно.
Надо будет обсудить с нашим маркетингом. Или наоборот - не обсуждать? :)

Японский проект

http://expert.ru/politics/2006/01/interview_pereslegin/

"...Они [японцы] вводят понятие «второго шанса»: человек, у которого не задалась первая половина жизни, имеет право на помощь государства, чтобы начать все сначала — сменить имя, получить кредит и так далее. Японцы собираются переработать Конституцию в духе этого документа и затем приступить к исполнению плана."

The Nature of Paradim Shift :)))

If history repeats, the nature of the paradigm shift would have the following properties:

• It will be coded by one, two, or three geeks who are fed up
• It will be all over the news for two days before disappearing again
• It will have an open source tool
• It would be bootstrapped off the old paradigm
• It will be instantly dismissed by scores of developers
• It will be instantly dismissed by scores of "developers", who will write books about why it's not important
• Once it was understood by a few, a slew of companies will arise claiming to have a tool that implements it
• Microsoft will claim to have one ready in four months, called Visual NewParadigm.NET
• Years later some non-original tools will actually implement it.
• It's benefits may be relative to the old paradigm (ala procedural vs. OOP), not necessarily superior
• Once it is understood, something beyond it will arise iteratively, for a while they will be called the same thing, until they become distinct.
• It's not going to be programming language as we know it. Maybe some combination of architectural, evolutionary, and aspect techniques
• Lisp weenies will claim prior art
• The Perl community will claim it's been in the Perl Language all along, you just have to say "#(&&->$\/\//@mumble->frabitz;;" to accomplish it.
• Even after it's established by many as the Next Big Thing, people will have arguments as to what it is. (cf Nobody Agrees What Is OO)
• It won't be where the architects/scientists were looking
• Xerox Parc probably threw it out as unusuable, years ago.

цитата из Beyond Object Orientation